"Proposed Restructure of Competition Eliminator"


Let me say at the outset I am against class proliferation in the professional categories. These are the "stars" of Championship Drag Racing and are what the announcers spend a lot of time talking about and get a lot of TV. The professional categories are what you will try to explain to the new spectator or the TV audience so they can understand Championship Drag Racing easily. Competition Eliminator is different as no announcer will try to fully explain the details of this eliminator over a microphone.

If the professional categories are the champagne of drag racing then I propose that Competition Eliminator is the vegetable soup of drag racing. A hearty stick to the bones kind of essential kind of situation. Champagne is great but you can't live on it, you need substance to fill the void and a healthy Competition Eliminator is just that.

Competition Eliminator is where you get the Top Fuel and the Pro Stock racers of the future. I think the situation should be inclusive and not exclusive, if we include people in our sport not exclude them we will grow even faster than we are now. We cannot afford to lose one competitor to another type of motor sport and if we are exclusive we will.

I am proposing to add to the class structure for Competition Eliminator. Some will say "Let them run Modified, that is OK." Well Modified is a good eliminator grouping but it is not for every one. When Billy Meyer purchased IHRA he did away with all of the class racing and created a set of eliminators based on heads up index racing: 7.90, 8.90, 9.90, 10.90 etc. Some people did convert but many did not. A year later he had to sell a badly bruised sanctioning body back to recoup his losses. In all fairness there were other problems, but you should have heard the conversations in the staging lanes. The people who were now racing the fixed indexes were class racers the year before. They were not happy, but they really wanted to race, so they were there. Nobody knows if they would have been there the year after or not. IHRA does have competition and a lot of the "hard core" class racers travelled further and raced at NHRA. Here we don't have this opportunity so when people get disenchanted they just quit drag racing and go racing in another form or buy a boat. How many racers have we lost like this?? How many more can we afford to lose ?

There will be some who will say that no one will ever race in some of these classes. So what! Does it hurt to have classes that today no one is using yet they may in the future? When I purchase a set of sockets for my tool box there are some tools that get used every day, and some that only get used occasionally. There are even some that never get used, but I don't throw those tools away just because I have not used them yet...do you? If a class is unused today all it takes up is one line in the rule book and is this really that big of a problem ?

There are dozens if not scores of would be racers who would jump in if they had a "home" in comp. Our sactioning body ANDRA should add spaces for various 4 and 6 cylinder and non Chev V8 classes in comp, as outlined below as well as include a section for the "Nostalgia" racers. Remember Inclusive not Exclusive ! This is the way to grow. The Nostalgia racers will still have their own races but by including them in main stream drag racing it will give them more chances to race their cars and more racers on track.

Most of what you will see is new. Some of the changes to class structure are totally different from what we have now. These changes are designed to allow technology to move from dragsters to altereds by keeping engine sizes the same and adjusting the weight break to allow for the heavier car. This will reduce costs and improve the performances of each by allowing information learned from one class (altereds or dragsters) to move to the other. There is no reason to try to keep performance levels the same as in Top Alcohol where the cars all race each other "heads up". There is little need to create a completely different set of operating environments for each type of car. If you take a look at some of the classes some of the supercharged doorslammers could participate as either a supercharged Altered or a supercharged Nostalgia Altered. Same for the Wild Bunch racers. No one loses, everybody gets a place to race and some will get a couple.

Everybody who is racing now will still have a place to race. Some might have a very small change to make, sometimes as small as adding a letter to the class designation. This whole exercise is meant to increase the number of cars competing. It will do this very quickly as soon as the changes are made and the information gets to the market place. If you want growth in drag racing this is one very good way to achieve it.

Last year there were 403 entries at the Winternationals and most are predicting nearly 440 for 1998. If changes such as these are made it will take a while for new cars to be built but I bet it wouldn't take long to have fields of 500 or even 600 cars at large events. Small tracks will benefit as well as they will have more cars that will compete locally. Some of the people will build class cars and occasionally race them in DYO for a test and tune and this would swell the DYO racer numbers as well.

I would hope everyone will view this with an open mind and give it fair go. I hope you don't think all this is too big but this needs to be addressed as a package and not piecemeal. Inclusive is the key, not exclusive. You want people to come and race and if they have a comfort zone with a particular type of engine or combination you must make it easy for them to participate. In the end, does it really matter how many classes you have in an eliminator? You still end up with one winner at the end of the night. If it gets more racers to the track: EVERYBODY wins.

Indexes will sort themselves out with the very good index adjustment system we have here or very small changes to the weight breaks can adjust for small inequities. Once this is in place, we can adjust it.

The rules voting situation with ANDRA is a bit of a problem. I belong to two clubs and have sat in meetings where rules were being voted upon. Although a democracy is good, the problem lies in the fact that frequently you will have many people voting on rules that don't apply to them and/or they are not tuned in to the subtleties of a particular class. When I was assembling the ideas for this proposal, I spoke to the Nostalgia guys for ideas and tune-ups on their classes. When I was looking at the motorcycle- engined dragster classes I spoke to motorcycle guys. What came out of those discussions was a hell of a lot of good ideas from the people who knew the engines and cars that would make up the class. In other words the experts. Why should a Top Alcohol racer vote on Modified rules or a Super Sedan racer vote on Comp Bike rules. Let's let the experts (the racers) in each class or eliminator vote on those rules. I bet we get a better set of rules and if we don't who gets the blame... the racers themselves, that's who.

Remember - Inclusive not Exclusive.

Basic outline of classes for Competition Eliminator


NOTE:   Click on the class title to see the details.





Recommended general restrictions and safety regulations




DRAGSTER Australiawritten by Ken Lowe
from DRAGSTER Australia
pages 31-33 - May 22, 1998
© DAVID COOK PUBLISHING PTY. LTD. 1998


Back to PRESS CLIPPINGS Back to KEN LOWE RACE CARS Back to NORTHERN THUNDER home page